khad515

Members
  • Content count

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About khad515

Firestorm User

  • Name Фюрер
  • Guild Cruel World
  • Class Warlock
  • Level 110
  • Realm Sylvanas
  • Race Gnome

Recent Profile Visitors

390 profile views
  1. New patch with old bugs, yes, becouse they trying to fix only 7.3.5 content, but i guess they stat fixing old content too soon.
  2. i guess affliction works fine on ptr, thx god.
  3. funny. So after ptr with full art power and 1000 items, you want characters from ptr. Ofc from sylvanas
  4. Who tell you that 7.3.5 now? We have still 7.1.5
  5. Hey affli locks did you notice some changes in dps, or any changes? Or its me
  6. #BorisDie. I still hope boris never come again. You all mad about this boris meme, its annoying.
  7. Try to look offical dps charts for 7.1.5, you will see that destruction warlock not in top 5 dps.
  8. I dont uderstand what you mean top dps? You want be number 1 in recount or? What dps do you want?
  9. Why you need garrison in legion patch?))
  10. I hope they not, people really mad about this easy level up
  11. and i think soul effigy bad talant for affli warlock. 3th talant more better, becouse with right legendery i have 45% chance to return shard. soul effigy i guess just make rotation harder with small dps buff.
  12. Affliction dont have bugs in shard generation system, its just low on 7.1.5 patch. Hey, only class masters can test 7.3.5 content? Also, my friend playing in demon spec 890ilvl, in hero mode nighthold avg dps is 550k, in mythic+ 800k, i dont think that is low for 7.1.5.
  13. best way to approve your shard generation its 25% haste, legendery belt and helmet, 3 talant in last tier. We as affliction warlocks must to control this generation, im on single target use only 1-2 shards, sometimes 3 and have 450k dps at end of boss fight. Ofc in nighthold for example only 2-3 bosses without trash near.
  14. anyway destruction warlock shouldn't have any problems with shard generation, you just need high haste cap and right legenderies.
  15. thx alot, ill try